While it is true, the famous social network Facebook It is used by billions of users worldwide, especially through their mobile. But unfortunately many of them they get crashes and performance errors because of this appespecially people who handle Android devices.
It is because of that, mark zuckerberg and his team decided to create and develop an application called “facebook lite”, which is intended for emerging markets. In addition, it has also been implemented to provide a solution regarding slow connections. Thus, an app that occupies less than 2MB and can offer several of the functions that the “normal” or standard Facebook application ensures.
But, faced with this dilemma between both applications, users of the social network wonder about which one is more optimal to use Well, in what aspects do they differ from each other so that you can download and install the most suitable one on your Smartphone or Tablet. Indeed, we want to let you know the main differences between Facebook application “normal” and Facebook Litenext.
Comparison: Main differences between Facebook Lite and “normal” Facebook and which one should I use on my mobile
In order to know which one to choose to use on your mobile and that it works perfectly, in this section we present a substantial comparison, with which you will achieve better differentiate Facebook Lite from Facebook “normal”. Since, believe it or not, both present extremely relevant dissimilarities. Thus, he knows the following:
performance
In reference to this aspect, a completely remarkable dissimilarity can be located between both Facebook mobile applications. Since once you start using Facebook “normal” and Facebook Lite for a while, you will be able to notice the great difference in the performance that each one of them throws.
In this sense, it should be noted that the Facebook Lite app presents an abominable fluidity. Especially when doing “scroll” or slide over the timeline of your account from this app. Which is totally logical. the little space it occupies on the device and for this, it was already expected.
In addition to this, it can be seen that it also has poor ability to load messages on the timeline. That is to say, Lite can load very few messages and because of this, when you want to see new messages, you will have to load them every two by three.
In this aspect of performance, it is also necessary to highlight that, in terms of loading times, Lite is completely disadvantageous when compared to the normal app. Since, it is visualized that the loading times in the transitions of the app they are hugeregardless of whether it is to open a small image, to visit a friend’s profile or to enter a new page on the timeline.
In short, if you want to use an app that performs well overall, It is best that you install the “normal” FB application and drop the idea of making use of . Since, the dissimilarities in performance are very noticeable.
the interface
After performance, the feature that makes the biggest difference between normal Facebook and Lite is the change in the interface. Which, in the Lite version is completely reduced and is much more minimalist.
In detail, we indicate that, at the top of the screen, the sections that show both apps they are totally different. Since, referring to the normal application, it only shows the search bar in the blue bar. Now, in the case of FB Lite, it contains icons inserted in the blue bar and the search bar disappears, so now transforms into another section with a magnifying glass icon.
Also, located on the home page of the social network, you will also see that one app changes significantly from the other. Starting because the complete app shows the images that your friends share on the network, with a very visible and comfortable size. But, this changes in the Lite version which, reduces them so that they take less time to load. Thus, if you want to see it in a larger size, you have to click on the content.
For their part, there are also differences in the icons to give “I like it” Y “Comment” a post. Since the Facebook Lite version contains much more minimalist icons and suppresses the signaling in text of the “Likes” that a certain post got, as well as the number of comments.
In short, the rest of the FB Lite tabs have a smaller appearance, with less colorful and more modest icons. Which, was designed in such a way because they assumed that the application would be used on small screens and so, they adapted it that way.
So, if you like to have a more detailed, comfortable and attractive experience on Facebook, It is recommended that you use the “normal” application. Since, the Lite app gives the feeling of being a more “dirty” and old platform.
Application weight and download
Before downloading and installing any mobile app, what users mostly check is the weight of the application. Since, this influences during the download process and also in the performance of the mobile, in case of presenting or not the indicated capacity.
Well, in the case of the complete Facebook mobile apphas a total weight of 60MB. Which is not an inconvenience or restriction for the people who proceed to download it with WiFi or 4Gbut if you have a slow connection, the best thing to do is to don’t install that app.
Now, as for the application of facebook liteof course it has a smaller weight and it is located between the 2 MB in total. So, even if you have a really slow internet connection, this won’t matter because in a matter of seconds You can enter your social network account through said app.
However, with respect to the use of the internal memory of the mobile, the normal application of Facebook returns a weight of 128 MB (without temporary or user data) and this is increased when you register and run the platform, since it can increase up to 307 MB. Which, doesn’t happen with Lite because it only occupies 4.56 MB in memory and when you register and do what you want within the app, the size it only grows up to 6 MB.
With this, you can understand that Lite is more advantageous for users who don’t want to take up a lot of space on their terminal just by using Facebook.. Keeping in mind that the difference in weight between the normal version and the Lite version is quite abysmal.
The functions
Facebook Lite, being a simpler and more simplified application, of course adds fewer features than the full FB app. Therefore, in this aspect, we also find a very relevant dissimilarity. Thus, we highlight the functions that the Lite version guarantees to be more specific, which are:
- Regular comments and “likes” or “likes”.
- States timeline.
- Friend requests and suggestions tab.
- Search section.
- Notifications tab.
- Facebook Messenger integrated. Which contains text, stickers and the ability to send or share photos.
- Profile page and managed pages.
- Automatic playback of videos in WiFi network.
In this sense, FB Lite integrates the functions most used in the social network and by adding Facebook Messenger, it presents good points to factor. Whereby, It’s not like it’s a feature-poor app, either. or mechanisms of interest within Facebook.
But, if you choose to enjoy a more complete experience within the social network, It is best that you use the “normal” FB application because this one totally wins when it comes to functions. Including thus, the new “I like it”, the famous Facebook stories, the possibility of broadcasting live videos and many more.
battery consumption
As well as the difference in weight between the normal Facebook application and the Lite version, there is also a difference between both apps regarding the consumption of the battery that they generate in a mobile or tablet. Except that, this is evidenced on a smaller scale.
Well, regarding the battery consumption that is observed when using the application through FB Lite, it is minimal because only decreases by 1 percent on an average time scale. On the contrary, the normal Facebook app can consume up to 3 percent of total apps used.
If you evaluate this in the first instance, it may not be that considerable. However, when you check it in the long term, the difference can be much more noticeable and substantial.
Is it really worth using Facebook Lite if I have a mid-range smartphone?
To classify a mobile as “mid-range”, the aspects to take into account are related to its processor, power, price, additives, quality of the material and other aspects. Which, in certain circumstances, can be limiting. Especially those who are based on the power and processor of the computer.
Well, given this, the question arises about the pre-existing need of users with mid-range Smartphones, to use Lite versions of certain applications and the benefits that this can bring to your mobile.
In the case of the Facebook application, basically depends on user requirements. Since, although it is true, by using FB Lite you will be able to manage Facebook Messenger in little space, little memory used and little data spent.
Which is a great benefit for those who own a modest phone that does not exhibit great power. So, if your mid-range phone cannot be classified as a powerful device, it is best that you make use of Facebook Lite.
However, if said mid-range Smartphone onwards can be located among mobile phones with remarkable power and, furthermore, it does not have bad connection or performance problems, there is not much advantage to using the Lite version of Facebook. As well, you could download and install the normal appbecause it will work perfectly on your device and also you will get more advanced features like Facebook Live, post stories on social network, etc.
Facebook Comments
Disqus